|
The
Financial Express
Mrs. Rajashree Birla
23 November 2004
The
will and the money aren't enough; institutionalised
listening and involvement can help the poor
live a better life
Over
three decades ago, Milton Friedman, the
Nobel Prize winner, said: "There is
one and only one social responsibility of
business to use its resources and
engage in activities designed to increase
its profits." Prior to him, in the
early 1920s, John Keynes had said: "The
business of business is to do better business
and transfer its benefits to its consumers
and stockholders."
Both Keynes and Friedman were talking in
the context of western nations. These never
had to face societal issues such as extreme
poverty and deprivation we as a nation have
been witness to. A high sense of business
ethics, corporate social responsibility
(CSR), inclusive of accountability to multiple
stakeholders such as shareholders,
customers, employees and the community
is on top of every progressive management's
agenda. Social and economic policies are
becoming inextricably intertwined. Economic
debates are increasingly influenced by societal
issues, such as health, education, and livelihood.
For
us in the Aditya Birla Group, CSR is very
much a part of the overall business portfolio.
All our group's community work is carried
out under the banner of The Aditya Birla
Centre for Community Initiatives and Rural
Development, which I am privileged to lead.
It is anchored by our corporate communications
team and we have 150 people working exclusively
for our social projects. We work in around
3,700 villages and reach out to approximately
two million people every year. Of these,
more than 60% live below the poverty line.
Their
first need is to have access to water. Second,
agriculture and other means of sustainable
livelihood. Third, health, and then, education.
These have, therefore, become the areas
of our focus. Though I must confess we are
giving education an enormous thrust, because
we feel it is only through education that
we can help them surmount their problems.
Annually, as a group, we spend approximately
Rs 65 crore on our social projects. This
includes the running of 33 schools in the
interiors and 16 hospitals.
Let
me share with you what we have learnt.
First,
in all our teams, we have inculcated a strong
commitment to listening to the communities.
So, all projects are planned in a participatory
manner, in consultation with the community,
assessing their basic needs, prioritising
these and then working on the project plan.
Implementation becomes the responsibility
of the community and the team. The projects
are constantly monitored and village meetings
are held to get feedback.
While
in the beginning we have to do a lot of
hand-holding, eventually, these projects
become self-sustainable. The important insight
is that institutionalised listening and
involvement help build a culture of self-reliance.
Design real solutions for real people
this has been our second insight. Sometimes
we have found projects are designed for
the 'feel-good factor,' which is really
of little benefit to the people. The ground
realities are very different. For instance,
when polio immunisation camps were conducted
in the villages, people from the deep interiors
could not bring their children, because
they simply could not walk 15 km to the
camp. So we have begun arranging for vans
and even bullock carts to bring the children
to the medical camps. This year, out of
the five lakh children we helped immunise
against polio, nearly three lakh had to
be brought from their huts to the camp.
Likewise in the mother-and-child care project,
where we are espousing planned families.
At our unit in Jagdishpur, we have set up
24 outreach clinics. These clinics are serviced
by lady doctors who provide ante-natal,
post-natal and child care. Because we offer
a bouquet of real solutions, our team has
been able to convince 18,000 women, belonging
to four blocks, to go in for planned families.
Our
third learning is that willingness to correct
mid-course is critical as well. Nine years
ago, when we first set up our centre and
collectively measured what our 60 units
were engaged in, we found there was no cohesiveness.
Each unit did a project in an ad hoc manner.
Through the centre, we knit all the units
and spelt out clear focus areas. As a consequence
today, all our units work in five key areas.
First, healthcare, inclusive of mother and
child care. Second, education. Third, self-reliance
through the engine of sustainable livelihood,
including agriculture and women empowerment.
Fourth, infrastructure support. And fifth,
espousing social causes.
Our
fourth insight is that creating an inclusive
feeling is extremely essential. When we
began our project with Habitat For Humanity,
which aims basically to build houses for
the rural poor, we ensured that villagers
contributed significantly to their own houses.
In the houses built by Habitat For Humanity
with us, the villagers provide their land
and their sweat equity another term
for labour and get an interest-free
loan of Rs 15,000. This has to be repaid
in 15 years. Through this inclusiveness,
we are building more than 100 houses for
villagers at our different units. They are
pucca houses with a room and a kitchen,
an attached wash-room and a portico. We
began this project at Hindalco. It is now
moving on to Indo Gulf, Indian Rayon and
Grasim as well. Interestingly, many self-help
groups (SHGs) have staked a claim to build
such houses. Today, we have more than 700
women SHGs with a membership of over 8,050.
Networking,
our fifth lesson, is an important point,
too. Working across institutions, with the
government and with NGOs, has helped us
pull together people with different kinds
of experience and expertise. Their wholesome
experience has proved beneficial to our
projects. We see our work as a social alchemist.
So, we have tied up with Sewa, Unicef, Sifsa,
Nabard, Rotary International, the Smile
Train, Care International and BBC World
Service Trust, apart from the government
and district authorities and many others.
We
have also found working for underprivileged
communities requires a different mindset.
Thus, taking on board people who have a
lot of humane qualities has been our sixth
bit of learning. Those who wish to opt for
social projects need a lot of empathy, adaptability
and strong moral fibre. These are people
not money-minded, yet believe in the concept
of intrapreneurship. Of our team of 150,
the majority have these qualities. They
are people who believe they can make a difference
and are constantly innovating to bring benefits
to the communities in which they work.
When
Mohammad Yunus of the Grameen Bank gave
his first free loans to 42 villagers in
Bangladesh, several naysayers warned him
this money would go down the drain. However,
none of his 42 loanees defaulted and his
philosophy that people are bankable came
true. We do know the poor have a sense of
self-respect and that, by and large, they
keep their word.
On
the business front, having a one-year plan
and a three-year rolling plan on community
projects with milestones and measurable
targets, is yet another learning. It has
helped us factor accountability and performance
management into our projects.
Another
forward-looking step has been to get our
projects audited by reputed external agencies.
They look at our projects and evaluate these
on qualitative and quantitative parameters.
They get in touch with the beneficiaries
and all project partners. Often, the measurement
provides us with additional insights.
India's
gross domestic product has been growing
at nearly a 6% real rate. This affords great
opportunities in lifting our people out
of poverty. With commitment and a sense
of urgency, together we can make this happen.
The
writer is chairperson of The Aditya Birla
Centre for Community Initiatives and Rural
Development

|